People searching for "Demostack vs Reprise" are usually on a sales or solutions engineering team that has outgrown live demos on a shared staging account. The data keeps breaking, a colleague's test records show up mid-call, and every new prospect means resetting the environment. All three tools here solve that problem, in noticeably different ways.
The short version
| Demostack | Reprise | Walnut | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Core approach | Clones your product's frontend into an independent demo environment | Overlays prospect data on your live app, or captures and clones it | Captures your product into guided and sandbox demos |
| Main use | Live sales demos and product sandboxes | Live demos with custom data, plus tours and clones | Guided demos, playlists and sandboxes for sales |
| Published pricing | No | No | Yes, $575/mo and $1,550/mo, annual billing |
| Pricing model | Quote only | Annual platform fee plus per-user licences | Tiers with editor and presenter seats |
Demostack
Demostack's centre of gravity is its cloning technology: it copies your product's frontend into a separate environment, which you can then personalise and present without touching production or a shared staging account. It sells that as product demos, product sandboxes and product tours, with analytics and enterprise governance (SOC 2, role-based access, SSO) on top.
The strength is fidelity. A cloned environment behaves like your product, so a sales engineer can go off-script on a call. The trade-off is the setup that fidelity requires. Demostack publishes no prices; its pricing page leads to a sales conversation.
Reprise
Reprise splits the problem into three products. Reveal injects prospect-specific data into your real, running application, so the demo is your live product with the right data on screen. Replay captures your product into guided tours for sharing. Replicate clones the application for interactive sandboxes.
That breadth is the reason to choose it: one vendor for live-call demos and for shareable tours. Reprise also publishes no dollar figures. Its pricing page describes a single annual platform fee plus flexible per-user licences, and asks you to request a quote.
Walnut
Walnut captures your product into guided demos, with playlists that let a buyer choose their own path, and adds sandbox demos, personalisation and a more advanced Salesforce integration on its higher tier. It is also the only one of the three with a public price list.
| Plan | Price | Seats |
|---|---|---|
| Ignite | $575/mo, billed annually | 3 editors + 3 presenters |
| Accelerate | $1,550/mo, billed annually | 6 editors + 6 presenters |
| Scale | Custom | Custom |
The seat split matters. Walnut separates people who build demos from people who present them, which fits a large sales organisation and adds overhead in a small one. Sandbox demos, SSO/SCIM and white-labelling sit on Accelerate, not Ignite. We cover the details in our Walnut pricing breakdown.
How to choose between them
- Your sales engineers run live calls and need an environment that behaves like the product: look at Demostack's clones or Reprise Replicate.
- You want your real, running application on screen with clean prospect data: that is specifically what Reprise Reveal does.
- You want guided demos and buyer-driven playlists with a published price to plan around: Walnut.
- Ask each vendor the same three questions: what it costs for your seat count, how long setup takes before the first demo is live, and who fixes a demo when your product changes.
When none of the three is the right tool
All three are built around the live sales call. If your actual need is a clickable demo on your website, in a follow-up email or inside a help article, you are paying for sandbox and presentation machinery you will not use. That job needs captured interactive demos: a walkthrough of your real interface that a buyer clicks through alone.
That is the job Peutly does. It captures the real DOM of your product, with unlimited users on every plan, from $175 a month. It does not do sandboxes, data injection or live-call presentation, it has no native CRM connector, and it has no SAML SSO. If those are requirements, one of the three above is the better choice.
